There is ongoing debate about how our brains respond to gaming. I found this infographic from the Online Universities blog interesting. I particularly like the information about which parts of the brain are stimulated by playing video games but I think the jury is still out regarding the effects. What do you think?
Special needs students and their teachers are the victims of a “muddled” approach to schooling, says Leicester Uni http://j.mp/qB5qcd
Socioeconomic status as child dictates response to stress as adult according to University of Minnesota http://j.mp/qDZRZ8
Parents are forgetting how to play with their children, study shows – article from The Guardian last year http://j.mp/jdoiSR
Teenage web habits: slaves to social networking but not so keen on apps, according to article in Guardian http://bit.ly/qiXS0f
Infants Learn To Transfer Knowledge By 16 Months, OSU Study Finds http://j.mp/lPOAsG
Surprisingly useful advice from Vodafone Digital Parenting Magazine http://j.mp/lhRvrM via @darrenbristow
Supportive home learning experiences in the early years boost low-income children’s readiness for school. From NYU. http://j.mp/j3JmWs
Being born & raised in a city is associated with greater lifetime risk for anxiety & mood disorder. From Nature. http://j.mp/jrjGpu
The quality of preschoolers’ social interactions is influenced by the ethnicity of the playmate. From Montreal Uni. http://j.mp/m8AxNQ
Parents prefer media content ratings system in national study led by Iowa State Uni http://j.mp/jS7Psd
How parents communicate with teenagers on mobiles gives insight into relationship according to study http://j.mp/mrfR5l
New study suggests that kids who eat sweets are *less* overweight than those that don’t. http://j.mp/lUbKlO
Informal daycare may harm kids’ cognitive development, Chicago Uni study finds http://j.mp/jLBYP7 (pdf)
One-Fifth of Grandparents Use Social Networks [STUDY] from @mashable http://j.mp/jjiX1i
Teens still learning to plan ahead from Child Development journal http://j.mp/kzyUhz
Youth cybercrime linked to friends’ influence from Michigan State University http://j.mp/iBAKm3
NCSU research: Study Shows Sports Can Help Communities Recover From Disaster http://j.mp/o0bzkz
Distract Yourself or Think It Over? Two Ways to Deal with Negative Emotions from Association for Psychological Science http://j.mp/l37Fnm
Too much choice is a bad thing – Journal of Public Economics http://j.mp/kJXbgT
Snooze you win? It’s true according to Stanford reseasrch http://j.mp/iCsjtQ
The sharing of stories or information may be driven in part by arousal according to new study. http://j.mp/jCeDqH
Text message support for smokers doubles quit rates. From the Lancet. http://j.mp/k9CmP7
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs key to wellbeing but order unimportant – University of Illinois http://j.mp/lfSR5O
Practising a little can make lasting impact on brain according to study from McMaster Uni. http://j.mp/kTz1Dz
Being born & raised in a city is associated with greater lifetime risk for anxiety & mood disorder. From Nature. http://j.mp/jrjGpu
Multi-tasking not all it’s “cracked up” to be? Stanford Study shows? bit.ly/16ko3N
Learning Styles: The Cognitive Side of Content by Johnny Holland http://j.mp/izrUDk
Teens still learning to plan ahead from Child Development journal http://j.mp/kzyUhz
Youth cybercrime linked to friends’ influence from Michigan State University http://j.mp/iBAKm3
A selection of the articles thatI’ve seen about psychology and neuroscience recently:
Changes in brain circuitry play role in moral sensitivity as people grow up – UChicago News http://j.mp/ih8rrU
Violent video games reduce brain response to violence and increase aggression according to Uni Missouri http://j.mp/j7jSPs
Don’t Believe Facebook; You Only Have 150 Friends : NPR http://j.mp/ljMBjP
The way Facebook changes relationships by Benjamin Cohen from C4 news http://j.mp/k0T0re
Autonomy, not money, makes us happy according to APA study http://j.mp/liSDNx
Income Disparity Makes People Unhappy – Association for Psychological Science http://j.mp/mTEDxF
Lack of relationships, education top list of common American regrets according to Illinois study http://j.mp/k5kZUm
According to research from Ohio, young adults get self-esteem boost from debt http://j.mp/lr3s30
Expertise insulates against bias. Research from Virginia http://j.mp/jLZ8NS
Viewers Look To TV Characters To Advise How To Talk About Sexual Health. Research from Ohio http://j.mp/itDcsG
7 things not to forget about change http://j.mp/iuxvuH
Psychology & neuroscience: are we in a golden age or victims of neuromania? http://ow.ly/5nBrn
Testing Improves Memory from Association for Psychological Science http://j.mp/lrPY1p
There’s an interesting article in this week’s Journal of Neuroscience about the how we learn, specifically how our genes might influence our attitude towards learning from instruction or experience. It’s an interesting new perspective on the differences between learning and teaching.
According to researchers from Brown University, people genetically inclined to follow instructions can make sensible decisions much more quickly than if they had to learn the right thing to do from experience. They say “In some cases (e.g., “Danger: high voltage”) experience is a very dangerous way to learn. But in other cases (e.g. “The cable guy should be there at 1 p.m.” or “This slot machine pays off”), believing in advice for too long is just foolish.”
Recognising that learning from first principles can be slower and less effective is an important point. Of course there are times when working something out for ourselves is essential but only the most determined and diligent of us would want or be capable of doing that for even the essential disciplines and subjects required for twenty-first century life.
The concept of teaching has become rather unfashionable in many quarters. ‘Foisted teaching creates more harm than good; it blunts curiosity, promotes helplessness’ says Peter Gray over at Psychology Today. He stresses that it is ‘foisted’ or ‘forced’ teaching that is unhelpful but still there’s the implicit accusation that instructing someone on the basis of greater knowledge or experience is somehow morally dubious.
The dissatisfaction with ‘teaching’ also fails to acknowledge a key outcome in schools: that many of us would never choose to study some of the subjects that prove so valuable or enjoyable later in life. One could argue that coerced exposure to ideas outside our own tastes prevents us from being self-absorbed egotists, helps us grow into more rounded individuals and seeds occasionally wonderful, life changing, serendipity.
The examples from Brown University illustrate how we can learn from others’ mistakes (“believe me, touching that electricity pylon is going to sting”) but we also learn from earlier successes. It makes our lives easier. And hopefully encourages us to pursue greater knowledge and understanding for ourselves.
The shift from learning from instruction to learning from experience takes places inevitably as we mature cognitively and emotionally. Teaching and learning are not mutually exclusive or even competitive: if we’re taught well, we learn better.
I struggled writing the title for this blog because it’s so obvious isn’t it? Of course education makes us cleverer, for many that’s the whole point. I suspect that many people, like me, have assumed that it’s about ‘filling’ our heads with knowledge but learning offers much more than that – it’s not just about making the most of the cognitive ability we have, the process of developing skills (mental, affective and physical) actually improves the brain itself.
According to the Brainwaves 2 report from the Royal Society this month (summarised earlier), education is “the most broadly and consistently successful cognitive enhancer of all.” It recognises that in popular understanding, cognitive enhancement is more usually associated with drugs, vitamins or sophisticated technologies so it’s nice to be reassured that that fundamental part of our lives, learning, is the most effective neurological exercise we can enjoy.
It’s reinforced by a study published in Bio-med Central by researchers looking at the Framingham Offspring Study. Analysis of nearly 4000 participants indicates that better education leads to lower blood pressure, lower body mass index (BMI), less smoking and less drinking (although educated women drink more than their less educated sisters, apparently).
It’s an important message to send to those who think the purpose of school is merely to find a job and that learning ends at the school gate.
This month, the Royal Society has published its latest report on neuroscience and education, Brainwaves 2. It is a gloriously positive assessment of learning and the contribution science can make to fulfilling its potential.
The report’s summary suggests that the fertile common ground between the disciplines offers a “future where educational practice can be transformed by science” and goes on to describe the key insights that might eventually lead to such a change.
It’s a fascinating read that I’ll unpack over the next few posts but I just wanted to start by flagging its main findings and recommendations.
“Education is the wellspring of our health, wealth and happiness”
Among the insights and opportunities that neuroscience provides for a transformation in education, the report describes:
As I say, it’s a treasure trove of ideas that I’ll comment on over the next few days. I think there are some interesting day-to-day implications for how we learn and facilitate learning. I’ll be interested in hearing what you think too.
Meanwhile on the basis of their thoughts (and the associated challenges), the Society recommends the following:
No-one’s going to argue with those, but it remains to be seen whether the Powers that be see fit to follow them up.
I have found my feet. Literally. The new flexibility I’m enjoying with my business has allowed me to rediscover the benefits of walking. Especially walking in the countryside – through woods, away from the busy streets. Such apparently frivolous activity has tangible benefits: without wanting to state the absolutely obvious, it is good for you. Not just physically but mentally too.
Stephen Kaplan’s research (pdf) describes the benefit as Attention Restoration Theory. It states that interacting with nature dramatically improves cognitive function (compared to being in a urban environment). In a post on Science Blogs, Jonah Lehrer explains “that nature, unlike a city, is filled with inherently interesting stimuli (like a sunset, or an unusual bird) that trigger our involuntary attention, but in a modest fashion. Because you can’t help but stop and notice the reddish orange twilight sky – paying attention to the sunset doesn’t take any extra work or cognitive control – our attentional circuits are able to refresh themselves.” In contrast, urban environments demand our attention giving us little mental space to rest and reflect. In an article for the New York Times (pdf), Lehrer goes on to speculate that these same physio-neurological responses might also help us think up new ideas.
It’s an exciting thought. And obviously there’s no substitute for the real thing but it seems that we can fake it if necessary.
Dave Munger talks about replicating ‘natural’ environments inside rooms to improve the effects of a study break. Apparently even murals of natural scenes have a greater positive impact on our cognitive ability than the more normal window view of another building.
If it can work with murals, how else might we manufacture it? It’s made me wonder how else we could achieve these benefits in circumstances that are far away from those woody glades. And not just in physical spaces. Virtual ones too. The increasing busyness of our online lives gives us less time and space to concentrate on one thing, let alone reflect on it. This isn’t just about formal or informal learning online, it’s about satisfaction and meaning generally.
Maybe there are lessons we can draw from our ‘biophilia,’ the tendency to prefer natural things. Can we incorporate the textures, colours, sounds and rhythms of nature into digital content in a way that seduces our brains? Can we recreate nature’s ‘structure’ to improve our synthetic experiences? It’s an intriguing thought.
I think I need another stroll.
The evolutionary psychologist, Geoffrey Miller, has published many papers speculating about the development of human creativity – that is, why would we evolve in such a way that we create apparently wasteful artefacts such as art, poetry, humour and music? According to Miller it is all about the Mating Mind – it’s peacock feathers and courtship or as John Keating in Dead Poets Society says, it is “to woo women.”
Now a new study suggests it might not be about sex at all. Or at least not all about sex. Research (pdf) published in the International Journal of Tourism Anthropology (yes, really), suggests that Disneyland, as the epitome of popular culture, storytelling, music and dance, tells us all sorts of things about entertainment, and it has nothing to do with woo-ing. Unless you have a thing for mice.
The paper proposes that rather than being about courtship, the creative aspects of the human brain and the behaviour they provoke is all about passing on information between generations; it is how parents play with their children, how society bonds and how it develops communally. “The brain circuitry involved in both the generation of, and response to, these traits was selected for because it enabled parents to increase their fitness by increasing their ability to influence their offspring” say the authors Craig Palmer of the University of Missouri, Columbia, and Kathryn Coe of the University of Arizona.
This idea of entertaining culture being part of child development ties in with the idea that play is part of a training ground for adaptability more than more obvious role-playing. In his book The Ambiguity of Play, play theorist, Brian Sutton-Smith argues that the dynamics of play mirror the biological processes that lead to adaptive variability, that is, play is characterised by quirkiness, unpredictability and redundancy.
By linking family behaviour with the activities associated with these theme parks, Palmer and Coe are connecting community bonding with play and reiterating the importance of shared parent-child amusement. Maybe going to the Magic Kingdom is more like entering the Magic Circle afterall.